A recent study published in the Journal of
Economic Behavior and Organization recruited 64 adult heterosexual married
couples. The subjects were asked how often they had sex, how enjoyable it was
and how happy they were in general, attempting to measure mood and energy. 32
of these couples were picked randomly and asked to double the frequency of
their sexual relations. If they had sex
once a month, make it twice; couples who had sex three times a week were told
to go to six. The sample ranged in frequency of sex from at least once a month
to a maximum of three times a week. The other 32 were told to go about their
lives as usual.
The lucky group completed a short daily online questionnaire that measured
the quality of their sex the previous day and their subsequent moods. This
particular study lasted about three months. The researchers discovered that
some in this group did manage to double their rate of intercourse. On average
there was a 40% increase in sexual relations.
Before sharing the results, a few comments are in order. 1. Any
conclusions to the study are related to these 32 couples. These couples were
not randomly selected from the entire universe of the heterosexual married. The
findings are certainly suspect. 2. Although the article in the June 28, 2015
edition of The New York Times did not describe the character of these 32
couples, maybe the original research did. However, what were the personality
characteristics of these individuals? What was the meaning of sex for these
individuals within their entire life space-their personal lives, their
relationship, their marriage? Freud, in his model, talked about the release of
sexual tension-pleasure. For these couples, were there other reasons for having
sex other than the release of sexual tension? Are we talking about intercourse
and/or ejaculation or what? What about the political, economic and social
conditions for each individual couple? What about procreation as a variable? 3.
There are many reasons for the frequency of intercourse? Certainly the couples
that had sex once a month versus the couples that had sex three times a week
were different. I’d be interested in knowing about their sexual differences. 4.
In this particular experiment there was only a 40% increase in sexual
relations. I’d like to know the why behind that figure. 5. These researchers
employed an online questionnaire. More interesting and more valuable,
insightful results would have been established from an in depth interviewing
process.
Findings of the study found that additional sex did not make these
people state more well-being in measures of energy and enthusiasm. Some
reported that more intercourse wasn’t much fun. There’s mention as to the
quality of sex, but it wasn’t explained.
In a 2004 study with 16,000 adults, people said that increasing the
frequency of intercourse from once a month to once a week increased their
happiness to the likelihood of having an additional $50,000 in the bank. What if
these individuals were involved passionate work environments. How much would
that be worth in a bank?
These studies apparently were concerned about numbers and/or
statistics. In the more recent study, intercourse frequency were just a
snapshot within a 90 day segment pertaining to these 32 heterosexual couples.
What if 32 married homosexual couples, or 32 unmarried couples were measured?
How different would the results be? As we know, love, tenderness and mutuality
of respect are important components within any relationship where the
expression of sex is associated. And sex just doesn’t mean intercourse. An
abundance of sex as opposed to compulsive sex is pleasurable, especially under
the right conditions. The mood, energy and alone time of the couples play and
important part within any relationship. Maybe, just maybe, the study was really
an indictment about the state of marriage in our country. Don’t forget that married
US households were 72.2% in 1960 and in 2012 and that number decreased to 50.5%.
Yes, we have falling marriage rates in the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment